TY - JOUR
T1 - Expandable Lattice Electrode Ablation Catheter
T2 - A Novel Radiofrequency Platform Allowing High Current at Low Density for Rapid, Titratable, and Durable Lesions
AU - Barkagan, Michael
AU - Leshem, Eran
AU - Rottmann, Markus
AU - Sroubek, Jakub
AU - Shapira-Daniels, Ayelet
AU - Anter, Elad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Heart Association, Inc.
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - Background: High-current short-duration radiofrequency energy delivery has potential advantages for cardiac ablation. However, this strategy is limited by high current density and narrow safety-to-efficacy window. The objective of this study was to examine a novel strategy for radiofrequency energy delivery using a new electrode design capable of delivering high power at a low current density to increase the therapeutic range of radiofrequency ablation. Methods: The Sphere9 is an expandable spheroid-shaped lattice electrode design with an effective surface area 10-fold larger than standard irrigated electrodes (lattice catheter). It incorporates 9 surface temperature sensors with ablation performed in a temperature-controlled mode. Phase I: in 6 thigh muscle preparations, 2 energy settings for atrial ablation were compared between the lattice and irrigated-tip catheters (low-energy: Tmax75°C/5 s versus 25 W/20 s; high-energy: Tmax75°C/7 s versus 30 W/20 s). Phase II: in 8 swine, right atrial lines were created in the posterior and lateral walls using low- and high-energy settings, respectively. Phase III: the safety, efficacy, and durability at 30 days were evaluated by electroanatomical mapping and histopathologic analysis. Results: In the thigh model, the lattice catheter resulted in wider lesions at both low- and high-energy settings (18.7±3.3 versus 12.2±1.7 mm, P<0.0001; 19.4±2.4 versus 12.3±1.7 mm, P<0.0001). Atrial lines created with the lattice were wider (posterior: 14.7±3.4 versus 9.2±4.0 mm, P<0.0001; lateral: 15.8±4.2 versus 5.7±4.2 mm, P<0.0001) and required 85% shorter ablation time (12.4 versus 79.8 s/cm-line). While current squared (I2) was higher with Sphere9 (7.0±0.04 versus 0.2±0.002 A2; P<0.0001), the current density was lower (9.6±0.9 versus 16.9±0.09 mA/mm2; P<0.0001). At 30 days, 100% of ablation lines created with the lattice catheter remained contiguous compared with only 14.3% lines created with a standard irrigated catheter. This was achieved without steam pops or collateral tissue damage. Conclusions: In this preclinical model, a novel, high-current low-density radiofrequency ablation strategy created contiguous and durable ablation lines in significantly less ablation time and a comparable safety profile.
AB - Background: High-current short-duration radiofrequency energy delivery has potential advantages for cardiac ablation. However, this strategy is limited by high current density and narrow safety-to-efficacy window. The objective of this study was to examine a novel strategy for radiofrequency energy delivery using a new electrode design capable of delivering high power at a low current density to increase the therapeutic range of radiofrequency ablation. Methods: The Sphere9 is an expandable spheroid-shaped lattice electrode design with an effective surface area 10-fold larger than standard irrigated electrodes (lattice catheter). It incorporates 9 surface temperature sensors with ablation performed in a temperature-controlled mode. Phase I: in 6 thigh muscle preparations, 2 energy settings for atrial ablation were compared between the lattice and irrigated-tip catheters (low-energy: Tmax75°C/5 s versus 25 W/20 s; high-energy: Tmax75°C/7 s versus 30 W/20 s). Phase II: in 8 swine, right atrial lines were created in the posterior and lateral walls using low- and high-energy settings, respectively. Phase III: the safety, efficacy, and durability at 30 days were evaluated by electroanatomical mapping and histopathologic analysis. Results: In the thigh model, the lattice catheter resulted in wider lesions at both low- and high-energy settings (18.7±3.3 versus 12.2±1.7 mm, P<0.0001; 19.4±2.4 versus 12.3±1.7 mm, P<0.0001). Atrial lines created with the lattice were wider (posterior: 14.7±3.4 versus 9.2±4.0 mm, P<0.0001; lateral: 15.8±4.2 versus 5.7±4.2 mm, P<0.0001) and required 85% shorter ablation time (12.4 versus 79.8 s/cm-line). While current squared (I2) was higher with Sphere9 (7.0±0.04 versus 0.2±0.002 A2; P<0.0001), the current density was lower (9.6±0.9 versus 16.9±0.09 mA/mm2; P<0.0001). At 30 days, 100% of ablation lines created with the lattice catheter remained contiguous compared with only 14.3% lines created with a standard irrigated catheter. This was achieved without steam pops or collateral tissue damage. Conclusions: In this preclinical model, a novel, high-current low-density radiofrequency ablation strategy created contiguous and durable ablation lines in significantly less ablation time and a comparable safety profile.
KW - arrhythmias, cardiac
KW - catheter ablation
KW - heart atria
KW - radiofrequency
KW - swine
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85064239669
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007090
DO - 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007090
M3 - Article
C2 - 30943762
AN - SCOPUS:85064239669
SN - 1941-3149
VL - 12
JO - Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
JF - Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
IS - 4
M1 - e007090
ER -