Abstract
Ariely examines the logic of inclusion/exclusion involved in the allocation of social, political and cultural rights to minorities. He argues that the unequal allocation of rights is determined by the degree of potential power inherent in the various types of rights, and that rights with more potential power, such as political and cultural representation rights, challenge the dominant group's position more strongly than rights to social welfare and cultural autonomy. Minorities are included at a higher level in spheres of rights with low potential power, and at a lower level in spheres of rights with higher potential power. He uses the case of the Arab citizens of Israel to illustrate the thesis, reviewing institutional practices of inclusion/exclusion as well as the attitudes of Israeli Jews towards the allocation of different rights as reflected in three attitudinal surveys.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 241-258 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Patterns of Prejudice |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jul 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Citizenship
- Cultural rights
- Exclusion
- Israel
- Israeli arabs
- Minorities
- Political rights
- Power
- Representation
- Rights
- Social rights
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Cultural Studies
- History
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring citizenship spheres of inclusion/ exclusion: Rights as 'potential for power''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver