TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring the research needs, barriers and facilitators to the collection of biological data in adolescence for mental health research
T2 - a scoping review protocol paper
AU - CELEBRATE Youth Expert Working Group
AU - Worrell, Courtney
AU - Pollard, Rebecca
AU - Weetman, Tyler
AU - Sadiq, Zara
AU - Pieptan, Maria
AU - Brooks, Gillian
AU - Broome, Matthew
AU - Campbell, Niyah
AU - Gardner, Nzinga
AU - Harding, Seeromanie
AU - Lavis, Anna
AU - McEachan, Rosemary R.C.
AU - Mondelli, Valeria
AU - Morgan, Craig
AU - Nosarti, Chiara
AU - Porat, Talya
AU - Ryan, David
AU - Schmid, Lea
AU - Shire, Katy
AU - Woods, Anthony
AU - Pariante, Carmine M.
AU - Dazzan, Paola
AU - Upthegrove, Rachel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2024/6/11
Y1 - 2024/6/11
N2 - Introduction While research into adolescent mental health has developed a considerable understanding of environmental and psychosocial risk factors, equivalent biological evidence is lacking and is not representative of economic, social and ethnic diversity in the adolescent population. It is important to understand the possible barriers and facilitators to conduct this research. This will then allow us to improve our understanding of how biology interacts with environmental and psychosocial risk factors during adolescence. The objective of this scoping review is to identify and understand the needs, barriers and facilitators related to the collection of biological data in adolescent mental health research. Methods and analysis Reviewers will conduct a systematic search of PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane, ERIC, EMBASE, ProQuest, EBSCO Global Health electronic databases, relevant publications and reference lists to identify studies published in the English language at any time. This scoping review will identify published studies exploring mental health/psychopathology outcomes, with biological measures, in participants between the ages of 11 and 18 and examine the reported methodology used for data collection. Data will be summarised in tabular form with narrative synthesis and will use the methodology of Levac et al, supplemented by subsequent recommendations from the Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review Methodology. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required for this scoping review. The scoping review will be conducted with input from patient and public involvement, specifically including young people involved in our study ('Co-producing a framework of guiding principles for Engaging representative and diverse cohorts of young peopLE in Biological ReseArch in menTal hEalth'-www. celebrateproject.co.uk) Youth Expert Working Group. Dissemination will include publication in peer-reviewed journals, academic presentations and on the project website.
AB - Introduction While research into adolescent mental health has developed a considerable understanding of environmental and psychosocial risk factors, equivalent biological evidence is lacking and is not representative of economic, social and ethnic diversity in the adolescent population. It is important to understand the possible barriers and facilitators to conduct this research. This will then allow us to improve our understanding of how biology interacts with environmental and psychosocial risk factors during adolescence. The objective of this scoping review is to identify and understand the needs, barriers and facilitators related to the collection of biological data in adolescent mental health research. Methods and analysis Reviewers will conduct a systematic search of PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane, ERIC, EMBASE, ProQuest, EBSCO Global Health electronic databases, relevant publications and reference lists to identify studies published in the English language at any time. This scoping review will identify published studies exploring mental health/psychopathology outcomes, with biological measures, in participants between the ages of 11 and 18 and examine the reported methodology used for data collection. Data will be summarised in tabular form with narrative synthesis and will use the methodology of Levac et al, supplemented by subsequent recommendations from the Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review Methodology. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required for this scoping review. The scoping review will be conducted with input from patient and public involvement, specifically including young people involved in our study ('Co-producing a framework of guiding principles for Engaging representative and diverse cohorts of young peopLE in Biological ReseArch in menTal hEalth'-www. celebrateproject.co.uk) Youth Expert Working Group. Dissemination will include publication in peer-reviewed journals, academic presentations and on the project website.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195888305&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081360
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081360
M3 - Article
C2 - 38862229
AN - SCOPUS:85195888305
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 14
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 6
M1 - e081360
ER -