Exponential lower bounds for the running time of DPLL algorithms on satisfiable formulas

  • Michael Alekhnovich
  • , Edward A. Hirsch
  • , Dmitry Itsykson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

DPLL algorithms form the largest family of contemporary algorithms for SAT (the prepositional satisfiability problem) and are widely used in applications. The recursion trees of DPLL algorithm executions on unsatisfiable formulas are equivalent to tree-like resolution proofs. Therefore, lower bounds for tree-like resolution (known since 1960s) apply to them. However, these lower bounds say nothing about their behavior on satisfiable formulas. Proving exponential lower bounds for them in the most general setting is impossible without proving P ≠ NP; thus, in order to prove lower bounds one has to restrict the power of branching heuristics. In this paper, we give exponential lower bounds for two families of DPLL algorithms: generalized myopic algorithms (that read up to n1-ε of clauses at each step and see the remaining part of the formula without negations) and drunk algorithms (that choose a variable using any complicated rule and then pick its value at random).

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
EditorsJosep Díaz, Juhani Karhumäki, Arto Lepistö, Donald Sannella
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages84-96
Number of pages13
ISBN (Print)3540228497
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2004
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume3142
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Theoretical Computer Science
  • General Computer Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exponential lower bounds for the running time of DPLL algorithms on satisfiable formulas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this