Factors affecting long-term sick leave in an industrial population

Arnona Eyal, Rafael S. Carel, John R. Goldsmith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Factors affecting long-term absenteeism for non-accident-related sickness leave in a large, remotely located factory (Dead Sea Industry, Israel) were evaluated. About 10% (89 persons) of the workers were found to be on sick leave for more than 20 days/year. This group was designated as high absence workers (HAW). Most of the sickness absence were for repeated short-term leaves due to intercurrent diseases, rather than for continuous periods related to a major or single illness. Average cumulative duration of sick leave in this group was 54 days/year. The average number of spells was 11 per year (4.9 days/spell). There were significantly more HAW among skilled (relative risk, R.R. = 1.6) workers or shift workers (R.R. = 1.3), compared to white collar workers. There were significantly fewer HAW among workers 35-49 years of age (7.6%) than among younger (12.5%) or older workers (13.8%). Except for possible hearing loss in one worker, no occupationally related illness was identified. Sixty-six percent of the HAW took many sick leaves, over 20 days during the year following the study year, and 52% of this group took over 20 days in the preceding year (usually for minor diseases or complaints). This pattern of long-term sickness absence indicates that various socioeconomic factors determine HAW to a greater extent than immediate occupational risks or health problems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)279-282
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
Volume66
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 1994

Keywords

  • Absenteeism
  • Sick-leave
  • Sickness absence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Factors affecting long-term sick leave in an industrial population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this