TY - JOUR
T1 - Feature representation and signal classification in fluorescence in-situ hybridization image analysis
AU - Lerner, Boaz
AU - Clocksin, William F.
AU - Dhanjal, Seema
AU - Hultén, Maj A.
AU - Bishop, Christopher M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received June 20, 1999; revised March 22, 2000 and September 9, 2001. This work was supported in part by EPSRC, U.K., under Contract GR/L51072: Automatic Analysis of FISH Images and in part by the Paul Ivanier Center for Robotics and Production Management, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel. This paper was recommended by Associate Editor V. Murino. B. Lerner is with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel (e-mail: [email protected]). W. F. Clocksin is with the Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG, U.K. S. Dhanjal is with Department of the Biological Sciences, Warwick University, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K. M. A. Hultén is with Department of the Biological Sciences, Warwick University, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K. C. M. Bishop is with Microsoft Research, Cambridge CB2 3NH, U.K. Publisher Item Identifier S 1083-4427(01)10805-2.
PY - 2001/11/1
Y1 - 2001/11/1
N2 - Fast and accurate analysis of fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) images for signal counting will depend mainly upon two components: a classifier to discriminate between artifacts and valid signals of several fluorophores (colors), and well discriminating features to represent the signals. Our previous work has focused on the first component. To investigate the second component, we evaluate candidate feature sets by illustrating the probability density functions (pdfs) and scatter plots for the features. The analysis provides first insight into dependencies between features, indicates the relative importance of members of a feature set, and helps in identifying sources of potential classification errors. Class separability yielded by different feature subsets is evaluated using the accuracy of several neural network (NN)-based classification strategies, some of them hierarchical, as well as using a feature selection technique making use of a scatter criterion. The complete analysis recommends several intensity and hue features for representing FISH signals. Represented by these features, around 90% of valid signals and artifacts of two fluorophores are correctly classified using the NN. Although applied to cytogenetics, the paper presents a comprehensive, unifying methodology of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of pattern feature representation essential for accurate image classification. This methodology is applicable to many other real-world pattern recognition problems.
AB - Fast and accurate analysis of fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) images for signal counting will depend mainly upon two components: a classifier to discriminate between artifacts and valid signals of several fluorophores (colors), and well discriminating features to represent the signals. Our previous work has focused on the first component. To investigate the second component, we evaluate candidate feature sets by illustrating the probability density functions (pdfs) and scatter plots for the features. The analysis provides first insight into dependencies between features, indicates the relative importance of members of a feature set, and helps in identifying sources of potential classification errors. Class separability yielded by different feature subsets is evaluated using the accuracy of several neural network (NN)-based classification strategies, some of them hierarchical, as well as using a feature selection technique making use of a scatter criterion. The complete analysis recommends several intensity and hue features for representing FISH signals. Represented by these features, around 90% of valid signals and artifacts of two fluorophores are correctly classified using the NN. Although applied to cytogenetics, the paper presents a comprehensive, unifying methodology of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of pattern feature representation essential for accurate image classification. This methodology is applicable to many other real-world pattern recognition problems.
KW - Color image segmentation
KW - Feature representation
KW - Fluorescence in-situ hybridization
KW - Image analysis
KW - Neural networks
KW - Signal classification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035521286&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/3468.983421
DO - 10.1109/3468.983421
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0035521286
SN - 1083-4427
VL - 31
SP - 655
EP - 665
JO - IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans
JF - IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans
IS - 6
ER -