Financial education and savings outcomes for low-income IDA participants: Does age make a difference?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study considers the impact of financial education dosage on savings outcomes of participants in Individual Development Account (IDA) programs. It analyzes data from a sample of approximately 2,000 participants in the American Dream Policy Demonstration, disaggregates outcomes by age, and uses propensity score modeling to control for endogeneity and selection bias. We find that, relative to counterparts who did not complete educational requirements, IDA participants who completed program requirements for financial education had higher average monthly savings, saved a higher portion of their income, and deposited savings more frequently. Notably, we find that participants aged 36 or older experienced increasing returns on investment in financial education, and the best outcomes are found among those with more than 200% of the required dose of financial education. However, younger participants with more than 100% of the required dose are found to experience a diminishing return on their investment in financial education.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-185
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Consumer Affairs
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2015
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Financial education and savings outcomes for low-income IDA participants: Does age make a difference?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this