Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Financial regulation and bankruptcy prediction: The informational value of auditor opinions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We test whether auditors’ Going-Concern Opinions (GCOs) provide incremental predictive content for corporate bankruptcy beyond analysts’ information and accounting- and market-based indicators. Using U.S. firm-year data from 1992–2018 and conditioning on analysts’ forecast bias, error, dispersion, and coverage, we find that GCO issuance is associated with a 20%–56% higher probability of bankruptcy. Adding GCOs to the model increases explanatory power by 12%–18%. Analyst bias and error are positively related to failure, while coverage is negatively related, indicating that auditors and analysts supply distinct, complementary signals. The evidence positions GCOs as economically meaningful state variables for default-risk models—rather than mere narrative disclosures—with particular value when analyst coverage is thin or forecast precision is weak. These findings have direct implications for policymakers, regulators and capital market participants.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108432
JournalFinance Research Letters
Volume86
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • Analyst coverage
  • Bankruptcy prediction
  • Corporate bankruptcy
  • Earnings forecasts
  • Going concern opinion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Financial regulation and bankruptcy prediction: The informational value of auditor opinions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this