Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Finding common ground on conceptualization and treatment: Reply to Bridges et al. (2026), Cox (2026), Fung et al. (2026), and McLean and Wiltsey-Stirman (2026).

  • Arielle Rubenstein
  • , Jennifer Doran
  • , Or Duek
  • , Ilan Harpaz-Rotem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This is a reply to commentaries by Bridges et al. (2026), Cox (2026), Fung et al. (2026), and McLean and Wiltsey-Stirman (2026) on the authors’ original work titled “To Expose or Not to Expose: A Comprehensive Perspective on Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder” (Rubenstein et al., 2024). Their work provides insightful challenges and contributions in three areas: (1) a necessary corrective regarding our perspective on prolonged exposure therapy, (2) the transtheoretical nature of exposure, and (3) the importance of interpersonal and cultural factors in posttraumatic stress disorder. The authors are grateful for this opportunity to further dialogue about ways to improve upon existing models of trauma and its treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-122
Number of pages2
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume81
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • evidence-based psychotherapies
  • exposure
  • trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Finding common ground on conceptualization and treatment: Reply to Bridges et al. (2026), Cox (2026), Fung et al. (2026), and McLean and Wiltsey-Stirman (2026).'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this