Foraging behaviour in East Asian desert rodents and its implications on coexistence

Ling Ying Shuai, Yan Ling Song, Burt P. Kotler, Keren Embar, Zhi Gao Zeng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

We studied the foraging behaviour of two sympatric rodents (Meriones meridianus and Dipus sagitta) in the Gobi Desert, Northwestern China. The role of the foraging behaviour in promoting species coexistence was also examined. We used giving-up densities (GUDs) in artificial food patches to measure the patch use of rodents and video trapping to directly record the foraging behaviour, vigilance, and interspecific interactions. Three potential mechanisms of coexistence were evaluated (1) microhabitat partitioning; (2) spatial heterogeneity of resource abundance with a tradeoff in foraging efficiency vs. locomotion; and (3) temporal partitioning on a daily scale. Compared to M. meridianus, D. sagitta generally possessed lower GUDs, spent more time on patches, and conducted more visits per tray per capita, regardless of microhabitat. However, M. meridianus possessed advantages in average harvesting rates and direct interference against D. sagitta. Our results only partly support the third mechanism listed above. We propose another potential mechanism of coexistence: a tradeoff between interference competition and safety, with M. meridianus better at interference competition and D. sagitta better at avoiding predation risk. This mechanism is uncommon in previously studied desert rodent systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-177
Number of pages7
JournalIsrael Journal of Ecology and Evolution
Volume62
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2016

Keywords

  • coexistence
  • foraging behaviour
  • gerbil
  • giving-up density
  • jerboa

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Foraging behaviour in East Asian desert rodents and its implications on coexistence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this