Abstract
Pepper & Nettle (P&N) suggest that the poor present a "contextually appropriate response" to a perceived limited control and to a short life expectancy. We argue that differences in health, behavior, or impaired economic decisions are better explained by self-control. We discuss the implications of the differences between these perspectives and present supporting findings from two intervention studies with marginalized populations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | e321 |
Journal | The Behavioral and brain sciences |
Volume | 40 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - 1 Jan 2017 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Physiology
- Behavioral Neuroscience