TY - JOUR
T1 - From the therapeutic to the post-therapeutic
T2 - The resilient subject, its social imaginary, and its practices in the shadow of 9/11
AU - Brunner, José
AU - Plotkin Amrami, Galia
N1 - Funding Information:
Earlier drafts of this paper were presented at a number of occasions: In the lecture series “Umkämpfte Psyche. Zur Rekontextualisierung psychischen Leids im Kapitalismus”, at the Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main; at a joint colloquium of the Departments of Contemporary History, Mediterranean History and North-American History at the Ruhr-University, Bochum; at the colloquium of the Department of History of the Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg; and at a joint seminar of the Collegium and the International Advisory Board of the Institute for Social Research in Frankfurt/Main. We are most grateful for the helpful comments and criticism we received on all these occasions. The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Research for this paper was supported by the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Tel-Aviv University, under Grant 0614018161.
Funding Information:
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/ or publication of this article: Research for this paper was supported by the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Tel-Aviv University, under Grant 0614018161.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019.
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - In the aftermath of 9/11, the concept of psychological resilience, which refers to the ability to “bounce back” after adversity, became prominent across the American mental health community. Resilience thinking made its way quickly into the U.S. military, where it sparked the most expensive psychological intervention program in history. This article interweaves four strands of explanation—political, scientific, technological, and cultural—to account for the success of resilience thinking in the U.S. military and beyond. It shows that theories and practices of psychological resilience are not as novel as their proponents make them out to be. However, it also details how the ideal of a post-therapeutic, resilient subject became the cornerstone of a new, post-9/11 social imaginary. This article concludes that the contemporary ascendancy of psychological resilience indicates that rather than allying itself with the therapeutic as it had done previously, post-9/11 neoliberalism has moved toward the post-therapeutic.
AB - In the aftermath of 9/11, the concept of psychological resilience, which refers to the ability to “bounce back” after adversity, became prominent across the American mental health community. Resilience thinking made its way quickly into the U.S. military, where it sparked the most expensive psychological intervention program in history. This article interweaves four strands of explanation—political, scientific, technological, and cultural—to account for the success of resilience thinking in the U.S. military and beyond. It shows that theories and practices of psychological resilience are not as novel as their proponents make them out to be. However, it also details how the ideal of a post-therapeutic, resilient subject became the cornerstone of a new, post-9/11 social imaginary. This article concludes that the contemporary ascendancy of psychological resilience indicates that rather than allying itself with the therapeutic as it had done previously, post-9/11 neoliberalism has moved toward the post-therapeutic.
KW - Gilles Deleuze
KW - Michel Foucault
KW - positive psychology
KW - post-therapeutic
KW - resilience training
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063162973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0959354319830784
DO - 10.1177/0959354319830784
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85063162973
SN - 0959-3543
VL - 29
SP - 219
EP - 239
JO - Theory and Psychology
JF - Theory and Psychology
IS - 2
ER -