Abstract
Various attempts have been made to argue that the plain meaning of the story of the Garden of Eden in Genesis 2-3 supports a feminist, or at least a woman-friendly, understanding of the gender and sexual relationships between Adam and Eve. I counter that these arguments are not convincing and are hard to square with the biblical text, by considering four central elements in the story: (1) The sexual nature of ha'adam, Adam/ the earthling at the start of our story; (2) God's ‘curse’ of Eve; (3) The meaning of the woman being a ‘helper’ to Adam; and (4) Adam's naming of the woman. I conclude that the most plausible meaning of these chapters is that Adam dominates Eve sexually and otherwise from the very moment of Eve's creation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 319-335 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Theology and Sexuality |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jan 2006 |
Keywords
- Adam
- Eve
- Garden of Eden
- Phyllis Bird
- Phyllis Trible
- feminist interpretation
- patriarchy in the Bible
- sexuality in the Bible
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Gender Studies
- Religious studies