Gender differences in the media interviews of bill and Hillary Clinton

Camelia Suleiman, Daniel C. O'Connell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Does gender make a difference in the way politicians speak and are spoken to in public? This paper examines perspective in three television interviews and two radio interviews with Bill Clinton in June 2004 and in three television interviews and two radio interviews with Hillary Clinton in June 2003 with the same interviewers. Our perspectival approach assumes that each utterance has a dialogically constructed point of view. Earlier research has shown that markers of conceptual orality and literacy as well as referencing (name and pronoun use for self and other reference) do reflect perspective. This paper asks whether perspective is gendered. Our data analysis demonstrates that some markers of perspective show gender differences while others do not. Those that do include the number of syllables spoken by each interlocutor, referencing, the use of the intensifier so, the use of the hedge you know, the use of non-standard pronunciations, turn transitions, and lastly the use of laughter.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-48
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Psycholinguistic Research
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Gender differences
  • Perspective
  • Television interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • General Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender differences in the media interviews of bill and Hillary Clinton'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this