TY - GEN
T1 - Geometric Optimization Parameterized by Piercing Complexity
AU - Banik, Aritra
AU - Raman, Rajiv
AU - Ray, Saurabh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Aritra Banik, Rajiv Raman, and Saurabh Ray.
PY - 2026/7/1
Y1 - 2026/7/1
N2 - Packing and Covering problems with geometric regions in the plane have been extensively studied and several notions of “complexity” of the regions involved have been developed and exploited to obtain good approximation algorithms. Examples of such complexity measures are VC-dimension, union complexity, shallow-cell complexity, fatness, etc. While these restrictions lead to constant-factor approximation algorithms in many cases, they typically do not lead to PTASs. In fact, several geometric Set Cover and Discrete Independent Set variants remain APX-hard even when these parameters are small, as demonstrated in earlier work by Chan and Grant (Exact algorithms and APX-hardness results for geometric packing and covering problems. Comput. Geom., 2014), and by Har-Peled and Quanrud (Approximation Algorithms for Polynomial-Expansion and Low-Density Graphs. SIAM J. Comput., 2017). A key feature of these hardness constructions is that many pairs of regions in the input pierce one another. Motivated by this observation, we initiate a systematic study of geometric families parameterized by their piercing complexity. A connected region A is said to pierce a connected region B if B \ A has more than one connected component; we consider instances in which every region is pierced by at most a constant number of others. This framework smoothly interpolates between the classical non-piercing case-where local-search PTASs are known due to Raman and Ray (Constructing Planar Support for Non-Piercing Regions, Discret. Comput. Geom., 2020), and the fully general case, where APX-hardness persists. Our main contribution is to show that bounded-piercing families admit efficient approximation schemes for fundamental geometric optimization problems. For regions in the plane with a constant piercing bound, we obtain PTASs for the (unweighted) Discrete Independent Set and Set Cover problems, and constant-factor approximation algorithms for their weighted variants. These results strictly generalize the known PTASs for non-piercing families and yield improved guarantees for several long-standing special cases, including Independent Set and Set Cover with axis-parallel rectangles under bounded piercing. Overall, our work identifies piercing complexity as a robust and expressive topological parameter-distinct from geometric notions such as density or fatness-and demonstrates that bounding this parameter yields a broad family of geometric instances for which PTASs become achievable.
AB - Packing and Covering problems with geometric regions in the plane have been extensively studied and several notions of “complexity” of the regions involved have been developed and exploited to obtain good approximation algorithms. Examples of such complexity measures are VC-dimension, union complexity, shallow-cell complexity, fatness, etc. While these restrictions lead to constant-factor approximation algorithms in many cases, they typically do not lead to PTASs. In fact, several geometric Set Cover and Discrete Independent Set variants remain APX-hard even when these parameters are small, as demonstrated in earlier work by Chan and Grant (Exact algorithms and APX-hardness results for geometric packing and covering problems. Comput. Geom., 2014), and by Har-Peled and Quanrud (Approximation Algorithms for Polynomial-Expansion and Low-Density Graphs. SIAM J. Comput., 2017). A key feature of these hardness constructions is that many pairs of regions in the input pierce one another. Motivated by this observation, we initiate a systematic study of geometric families parameterized by their piercing complexity. A connected region A is said to pierce a connected region B if B \ A has more than one connected component; we consider instances in which every region is pierced by at most a constant number of others. This framework smoothly interpolates between the classical non-piercing case-where local-search PTASs are known due to Raman and Ray (Constructing Planar Support for Non-Piercing Regions, Discret. Comput. Geom., 2020), and the fully general case, where APX-hardness persists. Our main contribution is to show that bounded-piercing families admit efficient approximation schemes for fundamental geometric optimization problems. For regions in the plane with a constant piercing bound, we obtain PTASs for the (unweighted) Discrete Independent Set and Set Cover problems, and constant-factor approximation algorithms for their weighted variants. These results strictly generalize the known PTASs for non-piercing families and yield improved guarantees for several long-standing special cases, including Independent Set and Set Cover with axis-parallel rectangles under bounded piercing. Overall, our work identifies piercing complexity as a robust and expressive topological parameter-distinct from geometric notions such as density or fatness-and demonstrates that bounding this parameter yields a broad family of geometric instances for which PTASs become achievable.
KW - Geometric set cover
KW - PTAS
KW - approximation algorithms
KW - axis-parallel rectangles
KW - geometric discrete independent set
KW - independent set
KW - non-piercing regions
KW - parameterized complexity
KW - piercing complexity
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105044595017
U2 - 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2026.21
DO - 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2026.21
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105044595017
T3 - Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs
BT - 53rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2026
A2 - Bhattacharya, Sayan
A2 - Nanongkai, Danupon
A2 - Benedikt, Michael
A2 - Puppis, Gabriele
PB - Schloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing
T2 - 53rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2026
Y2 - 7 July 2026 through 10 July 2026
ER -