Getting stuck or stepping back: Effects of obstacles and construal level in the negotiation of creative solutions

Carsten K.W. De Dreu, Mauro Giacomantonio, Shaul Shalvi, Daniel Sligte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Difficult issues in negotiation act as interfering forces but their effects on negotiation processes and outcomes are unclear. Perhaps facing such obstacles leads individuals to take a step back, attend to the big picture and, therefore, to be able to craft creative, mutually beneficial solutions. Alternatively, facing obstacles may lead negotiators to focus narrowly on the obstacle issue, so that they no longer consider issues simultaneously, and forego the possibility to reach high quality, integrative agreements. Three experiments involving face-to-face negotiation support the "getting stuck" hypothesis, but only when negotiators are in a local processing mode and not when they are in a global processing mode. Implications for the art and science of negotiation, and for construal level theory, are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)542-548
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Construal level
  • Left-to-right bias
  • Negotiation
  • Obstacles
  • Processing style

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Getting stuck or stepping back: Effects of obstacles and construal level in the negotiation of creative solutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this