TY - JOUR
T1 - GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation
T2 - the role of endometrial receptivity
AU - Orvieto, Raoul
AU - Meltzer, Simion
AU - Rabinson, Jacob
AU - Zohav, Efraim
AU - Anteby, Eyal Y.
AU - Nahum, Ravit
PY - 2008/10/1
Y1 - 2008/10/1
N2 - To examine whether the choice of the GnRH analogues used during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH), may influence endometrial receptivity, we studied 712 IVF cycles, in patients undergoing COH with GnRH agonist or antagonist and with the transfer of at least one top-quality embryo. The GnRH agonist group showed significantly higher endometrial thickness and higher pregnancy rate, suggestive of a higher endometrial receptivity, compared with the GnRH antagonist group.
AB - To examine whether the choice of the GnRH analogues used during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH), may influence endometrial receptivity, we studied 712 IVF cycles, in patients undergoing COH with GnRH agonist or antagonist and with the transfer of at least one top-quality embryo. The GnRH agonist group showed significantly higher endometrial thickness and higher pregnancy rate, suggestive of a higher endometrial receptivity, compared with the GnRH antagonist group.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41749106070&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.022
DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 18178197
AN - SCOPUS:41749106070
SN - 0015-0282
VL - 90
SP - 1294
EP - 1296
JO - Fertility and Sterility
JF - Fertility and Sterility
IS - 4
ER -