‘He doesn’t deserve to be in the higher track’: Teachers’ Justifications in Student Tracking Discussions

Avner Cohen Zamir, Adam Lefstein, Yariv Feniger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study examines teachers’ justifications for their student sorting decisions in two Israeli secondary schools. Combining descriptive statistics and micro-ethnographic discourse analysis of 281 audio-recorded discussions, the study offers a new perspective on tracking’s multiple social and organizational functions: providing students’ needs, rewarding and punishing students, satisfying teachers’ emotional needs, and efficiently using school resources. Most of the justifications were related to students’ needs (43%) and reciprocity issues (37%), with productivity justifications (20%) appearing less frequently. The study points in particular to teacher emotions as a key factor in the tension between formal sorting requirements and teachers’ sorting practices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalDiscourse
DOIs
StatePublished - 12 Dec 2020

Keywords

  • Discourse analysis
  • equity
  • justice perspectives
  • teacher discourse
  • tracking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘He doesn’t deserve to be in the higher track’: Teachers’ Justifications in Student Tracking Discussions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this