Abstract
Martin Sticker's discussion of the common moral agent contains much that I find insightful, true and significant. As a response to his paper, I focus on two important issues that nevertheless separate us: (1) Sticker claims that knowing our duty can be mere passive awareness and that it indeed is passive as awareness of the special status of humanity. I deny that knowing our duty is ever passive. (2) He further claims that the common universalization test is the paradigmatic way active agents acquire moral knowledge. I argue that Sticker appears to construe universalization as a formal test that presupposes no moral knowledge and that so construed the test cannot serve for acquiring moral knowledge.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 990-997 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | British Journal for the History of Philosophy |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 3 Sep 2015 |
Keywords
- FUL
- moral epistemology
- moral knowledge
- universalization
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How Do We Acquire Moral Knowledge? Is Knowing Our Duty Ever Passive? - Two Questions for Martin Sticker'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver