TY - JOUR
T1 - How far should JIT vendor-buyer relationships go?
AU - David, Israel
AU - Eben-Chaime, Moshe
N1 - Funding Information:
An equivalent of Fig. 1 may be found, in a somewhat condensed form, in Hill's paper. Also, we took the liberty of transcribing the writing of one of the referees. The work has been partially supported by the Paul Ivanier Center of Robotics and Production Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.
PY - 2003/1/11
Y1 - 2003/1/11
N2 - In pull production management systems such as JIT, deliveries must be made on an as-needed basis only, and production begins only when requested. It is supposed to match customer demand, i.e., producing only enough to replenish what the customer has used or sold. In this work, we argue that there should be a certain degree of independence between successive links of the supply chain, to allow flexibility in production management in individual links. We attempt to identify the degree of independence and level of flexibility in terms of lot sizing and delivery scheduling in a single-vendor-single-buyer system. Toward this aim, appropriate two-sided vendor-buyer inventory-production models are formulated, some interesting conclusions from their analysis are drawn, and a numerical study, which compares relevant policies, is discussed. It shows that imposing a lot-for-lot production on the JIT supplier is strikingly un-economical. On the other hand, delivery on demand can be met without intervening in the supplier's operations, and where deviation from the optimal of the resulting joint total costs is tolerable.
AB - In pull production management systems such as JIT, deliveries must be made on an as-needed basis only, and production begins only when requested. It is supposed to match customer demand, i.e., producing only enough to replenish what the customer has used or sold. In this work, we argue that there should be a certain degree of independence between successive links of the supply chain, to allow flexibility in production management in individual links. We attempt to identify the degree of independence and level of flexibility in terms of lot sizing and delivery scheduling in a single-vendor-single-buyer system. Toward this aim, appropriate two-sided vendor-buyer inventory-production models are formulated, some interesting conclusions from their analysis are drawn, and a numerical study, which compares relevant policies, is discussed. It shows that imposing a lot-for-lot production on the JIT supplier is strikingly un-economical. On the other hand, delivery on demand can be met without intervening in the supplier's operations, and where deviation from the optimal of the resulting joint total costs is tolerable.
KW - Integrated inventory models
KW - JIT
KW - Supply chain
KW - Vendor-buyer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037431629&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00274-8
DO - 10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00274-8
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0037431629
SN - 0925-5273
VL - 81-82
SP - 361
EP - 368
JO - International Journal of Production Economics
JF - International Journal of Production Economics
ER -