How not to reason with PISA data: an ironic investigation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

68 Scopus citations

Abstract

International comparative testing, such as the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), has considerable impact on policy-makers, the media and the general public. A central assumption underlying PISA is that global variation in students' academic performance is attributable to national educational structures and policies. The aim of this article is to demonstrate the problematic nature of this assumption. Rather than critiquing it from the outside, we turn the tools, data and presumptions of the current discourse of international comparisons upon themselves, showing that this assumption is refuted by analysis of immigrant student test scores. Data from the PISA 2009 tests show that Chinese immigrant students in New Zealand and Australia achieve math scores that are more similar to those of students in Shanghai than to their non-immigrant Australian and New Zealand peers. Thus, cultural background appears to be more consequential for the educational attainment of Chinese immigrant students than exposure to the educational systems of Australia or New Zealand. We discuss limitations of our analysis, using them as basis to discuss the shortcomings of PISA more generally.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)845-855
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Education Policy
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2014

Keywords

  • comparative
  • critical analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How not to reason with PISA data: an ironic investigation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this