Image accuracy of plain film radiography and computerized tomography in assessing morphological abnormality of impacted teeth

Lipa Bodner, Jacob Bar-Ziv, Adrian Becker

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    28 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    This study compares the image accuracy of computerized tomography (CT) with that of plain film radiography (PFR) in analyzing the 3-dimensional shape of impacted teeth suspected of being malformed. Eighteen patients with 22 malformed teeth were studied by PFR and CT. Crown shape, root shape, crown/root relationship, and tooth inclination and structure were assessed by PFR and CT. CT was found to be superior to PFR in showing the multiplanar shape of tooth crown and root, crown/root relationship, and tooth inclination (P < .001). No difference was found in the representation of tooth structures. The findings demonstrate that CT imaging is useful to diagnose and plan treatment for patients with unerupted and malformed teeth.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)623-628
    Number of pages6
    JournalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
    Volume120
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1 Jan 2001

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Orthodontics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Image accuracy of plain film radiography and computerized tomography in assessing morphological abnormality of impacted teeth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this