Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a type of in-vehicle collision avoidance warning system (IVCAWS) under conditions of driver distraction. Forty-three participants responded to an imperfect warning system while simultaneously driving a simulator and performing a visual/cognitive task. The major concerns were whether drivers would be more inclined to rely on such a system when they are distracted by subsidiary tasks, and if this reliance would be counterproductive. We found that distracted drivers responded, by increasing their temporal headway, to the less reliable system's alarms, but the warning system at the higher reliability levels led to over reliance and ultimately to maintaining shorter headways. This study has practical implications for the use of warning systems as driving aids for drivers. Although aids may be helpful and, in many cases, the more reliable aid is preferable, in the case of distraction, drivers may misuse the aid.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 345-357 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jan 2007 |
Keywords
- Alarms
- Automated aids
- Collision avoidance
- Driver behavior
- Driver workload
- Driving simulator
- Dual task
- IVCAWS
- Temporal headway
- Traffic safety
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Automotive Engineering
- Transportation
- Applied Psychology