TY - JOUR
T1 - Imperial Creditors, ‘Doubtful’ Nationalities and Financial Obligations in Late Ottoman Syria
T2 - Rethinking Ottoman Subjecthood and Consular Protection
AU - Derri, Aviv
N1 - Funding Information:
I thank Leslie Peirce and Zachary Lockman for their insightful comments on earlier drafts of this article. I benefitted considerably from the meticulous reading and invaluable comments of the two anonymous reviewers as well as the editors of this special issue, Houssine Alloul and Darina Martykánová. I am also grateful to Amy Singer, Iris Agmon, Avi Rubin and all the participants in the Society and Law in the Ottoman Empire conference (Jerusalem, 2018) for their insights. This study was financially supported by the Posen Society of Fellows.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - This article examines the ways in which Ottoman subjecthood and foreign protection were practiced and perceived by imperial financiers and officials following the nationality legislation of the 1860 s and the imperial bankruptcy in 1875. It deals with the non-Muslim merchant families of Damascus who served the province as credit providers, many of whom were under European protection. By the mid-1880s, these families found themselves in the midst of intense debates over their financial claims on the provincial treasury and their legal status, waged between the Ottoman government and European consulates. Focusing on one case of a local Jewish family, the article uncovers the category of ‘doubtful’ nationality (tebâa-i meşkûke) and the ways provincial officials in Syria used it to treat local merchants as Ottoman by-default. I argue that alongside legal notions of origin and residence which were introduced by the 1869 Nationality Law, Ottoman subjecthood was still practiced as a set of alienable and differentiated rights and duties, defined by fiscal obligation and service. Discussing these Ottoman strategies alongside British concerns and anxieties regarding foreign protection and naturalisation, I show how these legal-social categories and practices were shaped through mutual contact, in the context of unequal inter-imperial relations.
AB - This article examines the ways in which Ottoman subjecthood and foreign protection were practiced and perceived by imperial financiers and officials following the nationality legislation of the 1860 s and the imperial bankruptcy in 1875. It deals with the non-Muslim merchant families of Damascus who served the province as credit providers, many of whom were under European protection. By the mid-1880s, these families found themselves in the midst of intense debates over their financial claims on the provincial treasury and their legal status, waged between the Ottoman government and European consulates. Focusing on one case of a local Jewish family, the article uncovers the category of ‘doubtful’ nationality (tebâa-i meşkûke) and the ways provincial officials in Syria used it to treat local merchants as Ottoman by-default. I argue that alongside legal notions of origin and residence which were introduced by the 1869 Nationality Law, Ottoman subjecthood was still practiced as a set of alienable and differentiated rights and duties, defined by fiscal obligation and service. Discussing these Ottoman strategies alongside British concerns and anxieties regarding foreign protection and naturalisation, I show how these legal-social categories and practices were shaped through mutual contact, in the context of unequal inter-imperial relations.
KW - capitulations
KW - consular law
KW - Imperial citizenship
KW - inter-imperial relations
KW - non-Muslims in the Ottoman empire
KW - Ottoman political culture
KW - Ottoman state finances
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087775227&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07075332.2020.1774796
DO - 10.1080/07075332.2020.1774796
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85087775227
SN - 0707-5332
SP - 1
EP - 20
JO - International History Review
JF - International History Review
ER -