In defence of a contented religious exclusivism

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper I defend the possibility that a 'contented religious exclusivist', will be fully rational and not neglectful of any of her epistemic duties when faced with the world's religious diversity. I present an epistemic strategy for reflecting on one's beliefs and then present two features of religious belief that make contented exclusivism a rational possibility. I then argue against the positions of John Hick, David Basinger, and Steven Wykstra on contented exclusivism, and criticize an overly optimistic conception of rationality. Finally, I describe a contented exclusivist who might very well not be fully rational in the face of religious diversity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)401-417
Number of pages17
JournalReligious Studies
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Religious studies
  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In defence of a contented religious exclusivism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this