TY - JOUR
T1 - In-situ intestinal rat perfusions for human Fabs prediction and BCS permeability class determination
T2 - Investigation of the single-pass vs. the Doluisio experimental approaches
AU - Lozoya-Agullo, Isabel
AU - Zur, Moran
AU - Wolk, Omri
AU - Beig, Avital
AU - González-Álvarez, Isabel
AU - González-Álvarez, Marta
AU - Merino-Sanjuán, Matilde
AU - Bermejo, Marival
AU - Dahan, Arik
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/3/1
Y1 - 2015/3/1
N2 - Intestinal drug permeability has been recognized as a critical determinant of the fraction dose absorbed, with direct influence on bioavailability, bioequivalence and biowaiver. The purpose of this research was to compare intestinal permeability values obtained by two different intestinal rat perfusion methods: the single-pass intestinal perfusion (SPIP) model and the Doluisio (closed-loop) rat perfusion method. A list of 15 model drugs with different permeability characteristics (low, moderate, and high, as well as passively and actively absorbed) was constructed. We assessed the rat intestinal permeability of these 15 model drugs in both SPIP and the Doluisio methods, and evaluated the correlation between them. We then evaluated the ability of each of these methods to predict the fraction dose absorbed (Fabs) in humans, and to assign the correct BCS permeability class membership. Excellent correlation was obtained between the two experimental methods (r2 = 0.93). An excellent correlation was also shown between literature Fabs values and the predictions made by both rat perfusion techniques. Similar BCS permeability class membership was designated by literature data and by both SPIP and Doluisio methods for all compounds. In conclusion, the SPIP model and the Doluisio (closed-loop) rat perfusion method are both equally useful for obtaining intestinal permeability values that can be used for Fabs prediction and BCS classification.
AB - Intestinal drug permeability has been recognized as a critical determinant of the fraction dose absorbed, with direct influence on bioavailability, bioequivalence and biowaiver. The purpose of this research was to compare intestinal permeability values obtained by two different intestinal rat perfusion methods: the single-pass intestinal perfusion (SPIP) model and the Doluisio (closed-loop) rat perfusion method. A list of 15 model drugs with different permeability characteristics (low, moderate, and high, as well as passively and actively absorbed) was constructed. We assessed the rat intestinal permeability of these 15 model drugs in both SPIP and the Doluisio methods, and evaluated the correlation between them. We then evaluated the ability of each of these methods to predict the fraction dose absorbed (Fabs) in humans, and to assign the correct BCS permeability class membership. Excellent correlation was obtained between the two experimental methods (r2 = 0.93). An excellent correlation was also shown between literature Fabs values and the predictions made by both rat perfusion techniques. Similar BCS permeability class membership was designated by literature data and by both SPIP and Doluisio methods for all compounds. In conclusion, the SPIP model and the Doluisio (closed-loop) rat perfusion method are both equally useful for obtaining intestinal permeability values that can be used for Fabs prediction and BCS classification.
KW - Bioequivalence
KW - Biopharmaceutics classification system
KW - Biowaiver
KW - Intestinal permeability
KW - Oral drug absorption
KW - Perfusion study
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84922318685
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.01.014
DO - 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.01.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 25595387
AN - SCOPUS:84922318685
SN - 0378-5173
VL - 480
SP - 1
EP - 7
JO - International Journal of Pharmaceutics
JF - International Journal of Pharmaceutics
IS - 1-2
ER -