TY - JOUR
T1 - In the name of “social mixing”
T2 - The privatization of public housing to non-governmental organizations
AU - Shmaryahu-Yeshurun, Yael
N1 - Funding Information:
The author wishes to thank Professor Guy Ben-Porat and the four reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Urban Affairs Association.
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - This paper explores the invocation of “social mixing” to camouflage the reduction of public housing through state-led gentrification processes. I focus on the use of social mixing in Israel to justify the privatization of public housing projects, transferring state assets to not-for-profit organizations. These organizations encourage middle-class families and students to relocate to disadvantaged neighborhoods. Exploring this practice reveals tensions between stakeholders regarding their perceptions of social mixing. Data for this study were drawn from interviews conducted with policymakers, NGO members, and public housing tenants, supplemented by analysis of press articles and policy and NGO documents. Findings highlight use of the social mixing discourse to contextualize benefits accrued via differential access to public housing stock. Such benefits are viewed specifically by long-term tenants as displacement and gentrification. This study further assesses the advantages and disadvantages of this policy, explicating the links between gentrification and social mixing.
AB - This paper explores the invocation of “social mixing” to camouflage the reduction of public housing through state-led gentrification processes. I focus on the use of social mixing in Israel to justify the privatization of public housing projects, transferring state assets to not-for-profit organizations. These organizations encourage middle-class families and students to relocate to disadvantaged neighborhoods. Exploring this practice reveals tensions between stakeholders regarding their perceptions of social mixing. Data for this study were drawn from interviews conducted with policymakers, NGO members, and public housing tenants, supplemented by analysis of press articles and policy and NGO documents. Findings highlight use of the social mixing discourse to contextualize benefits accrued via differential access to public housing stock. Such benefits are viewed specifically by long-term tenants as displacement and gentrification. This study further assesses the advantages and disadvantages of this policy, explicating the links between gentrification and social mixing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113429894&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07352166.2021.1950545
DO - 10.1080/07352166.2021.1950545
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85113429894
SN - 0735-2166
VL - 44
SP - 343
EP - 360
JO - Journal of Urban Affairs
JF - Journal of Urban Affairs
IS - 3
ER -