Abstract
Rule 10b-5 of the 1934 Securities and Exchange Act allows investors to sue firms for misrepresentation or omission. Since firms are principal-agent contracts between owners - contract designers - and privately informed managers, owners are the ultimate firms' voluntary disclosure strategists. We analyze voluntary disclosure equilibrium in a game with two types of owners: expected liquidating dividends motivated (VMO) and expected price motivated (PMO). We find that Rule 10b-5: (i) does not deter misrepresentation and may suppress voluntary disclosure or, (ii) induces some firms to adopt a partial disclosure policy of disclosing only bad news or only good news.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 349-390 |
Number of pages | 42 |
Journal | Journal of Financial Markets |
Volume | 5 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jun 2002 |
Keywords
- Disclosure
- Incentives
- Noisy rational expectations equilibrium
- Principal-agent contracts
- Rule 10b-5
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics