Individual differences in infants’ expectations and preferences for responsive vs. unresponsive parent-puppets and their associations with early maternal behavior

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Infants’ mental representations of attachment are thought to develop across the first year. Due to methodological challenges, empirical attempts to assess these representations are scarce. The study presents a preliminary attempt to validate a measure of infants’ attachment representations. Seventy-two mother-infant dyads (34 girls) were assessed. At 4-months, 60 dyads were observed during free-play interactions. At 10-months, 72 infants viewed a puppet-show depicting a responsive vs. an unresponsive parent-puppet. Looking-time patterns indexed infants’ expectations, and puppet choice indexed infants’ preference for parent-puppets’ responsiveness. Infants generally expected (d = 0.42) and preferred (66%) parent-puppet-responsiveness. Moreover, maternal “responsive secure-base” behavior at 4-months was associated with infants’ expectations (r =.29, p =.025) and preference (d = 0.6) for responsiveness at 10-months. Findings support theoretical concepts, providing preliminary evidence for infants’ preverbal attachment representations and their roots in early social experience with their attachment figures. Future research using larger samples and standard attachment assessments is needed to validate this measure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)868-892
Number of pages25
JournalAttachment and Human Development
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2025

Keywords

  • Attachment
  • infancy
  • internal working models
  • maternal responsiveness
  • mental representations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Individual differences in infants’ expectations and preferences for responsive vs. unresponsive parent-puppets and their associations with early maternal behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this