Abstract
The present study introduces a continuous tracking procedure to investigate cognitive stopping in individual trials. Our measure of stopping performance had a mean similar to mean stopping times estimated in the stop signal paradigm, suggesting a common underlying process. Additional findings indicate that stopping performance and tracking performance were dissociable. First, while stopping times were primarily affected by stop signal modality, tracking performance was primarily affected by tracking difficulty. Second, tracking performance influenced tracking but not stopping in immediately following trials. Stopping influenced neither tracking performance nor stopping in immediately following trials. Finally, there was no correlation between tracking performance and stopping performance, or any dependency between them as found in the conditional means.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 469-489 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology |
| Volume | 56 A |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Apr 2003 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- General Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Individual stopping times and cognitive control: Converging evidence for the stop signal task from a continuous tracking paradigm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver