Induction of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: Lessons from a population-based study

  • Lea Shatz
  • , Lena Novack
  • , Moshe Mazor
  • , Ruthy Beer Weisel
  • , Doron Dukler
  • , Tal Rafaeli-Yehudai
  • , Osnat Israeli
  • , Offer Erez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: The aims of this study were (1) to determine the success rate of induction of labor (IOL) in women with a prior cesarean section (CS) and (2) to compare the perinatal outcome of a trial of labor (TOL) in women with one prior CS who had an IOL, spontaneous onset of labor, or an elective repeated CS (ERCS). Material and methods: This study population was divided into three groups: women who had (1) ERCS (n=1916), (2) spontaneous TOL (n=4263), and (3) IOL (n=1576). Results: (1) The rate of IOL in the study cohort was 20.3%; of these, 67.4% had a successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). (2) Patients in the spontaneous TOL group had a higher VBAC rate than did those who had IOL (P<0.001). (3) The rate of uterine rupture was comparable among all study groups. And (4) a prior vaginal birth increased the likelihood of having a successful induction and a VBAC by 50%. Conclusion: IOL in patients with a previous CS is successful in about two-thirds of the cases. Induction is a safe and useful tool that can serve as an alternative for ERCS and assist to reduce the rate of ERCS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-179
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Perinatal Medicine
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2013

Keywords

  • Uterine rupture
  • dehiscence
  • dystocia
  • endometritis
  • hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy
  • trial of labor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Induction of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: Lessons from a population-based study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this