Induction of labor in twin gestation: lessons from a population based study

Batel Hamou, Tamar Wainstock, Salvatore Andrea Mastrolia, Ruthy Beer-Weisel, Orna Staretz-Chacham, Doron Dukler, Tal Rafaeli-Yehudai, Moshe Mazor, Offer Erez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: The route of delivery and the role of induction of labor in twin gestations are controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of induction of labor in twin gestations. Methods: This retrospective population based cohort study included 4605 twin gestations divided into following groups: 1) spontaneous parturition (n = 2937, 63.78%); 2) induction of labor (n = 653, 14.2%) and 3) elective cesarean delivery (n = 1015, 22.04%). Results: The rate of vaginal delivery in the labor induction group was 81% (529/653). In comparison to the other study groups, induction of labor in twins was independently associated with a 77% reduction in the risk of cesarean delivery (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.18–0.31) and a 78% reduction in the risk of postpartum death for the second twin (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05–0.94). The rate of nulliparity, term delivery and labor dystocia was higher in the induction of labor group (p < 0.001 in all comparisons). Conclusions: Our results suggest that induction of labor in twin gestation is successful and is independently associated with substantial reduction in the risk of cesarean delivery and postpartum death of the second twin.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3999-4007
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Volume29
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - 16 Dec 2016

Keywords

  • Cesarean delivery
  • Foley catheter
  • oxytocin
  • prostaglandins
  • term pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Induction of labor in twin gestation: lessons from a population based study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this