Intellectual Captivity Literary Theory, World Literature, and the Ethics of Interpretation

Chen Bar-Itzhak

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This essay concerns the unequal distribution of epistemic capital in the academic field of World Literature and calls for an epistemic shift: A broadening of our theoretical canon and the epistemologies through which we read and interpret world literature. First, this epistemic inequality is discussed through a sociological examination of the "world republic of literary theory," addressing the limits of circulation of literary epistemologies. The current situation, it is argued, creates an "intellectual captivity," the ethical and political implications of which are demonstrated through a close reading of the acts of reading world literature performed by scholars at the center of the field. A few possible solutions are then suggested, drawing on recent developments in anthropology, allowing for a redistribution of epistemic capital within the discipline of World Literature: Awareness of positionality, reflexivity as method, promotion of marginal scholarship, and a focus on "points of interaction."

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-110
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of World Literature
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2020

Keywords

  • Epistemic inequality
  • Literary epistemologies
  • Literary theory
  • World literature
  • World theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Literature and Literary Theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intellectual Captivity Literary Theory, World Literature, and the Ethics of Interpretation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this