TY - JOUR
T1 - Interdisciplinary teaching and learning at the K-12 level in the humanities, arts, and social sciences
T2 - A scoping review
AU - Cohen, Etan
AU - Novis-Deutsch, Nurit
AU - Kashi, Shiri
AU - Alexander, Hanan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/8/1
Y1 - 2024/8/1
N2 - Interdisciplinary teaching and learning (ITL), also termed cross-curricular teaching and learning, and curricular integration, is a prevailing trend among K-12 educational practitioners and policymakers. However, with the exclusion of specific disciplinary combinations such as Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) or Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), the empirical scholarship on ITL in K-12 settings is unsystematic, leading to difficulties in knowledge integration. In this article, we take stock of the existing empirical literature on ITL at the K-12 level within the humanities, arts, and social sciences, examining how educational scholars have understood and implemented ITL in peer-reviewed research articles. We show how existing scholarship on ITL includes a broad range of definitions and conceptual framings of interdisciplinarity; discuss the portrayal of the process for designing and implementing ITL curricular units; and categorize the scholarly objectives of ITL research. We conclude by offering recommendations to guide the future development of this burgeoning field of study.
AB - Interdisciplinary teaching and learning (ITL), also termed cross-curricular teaching and learning, and curricular integration, is a prevailing trend among K-12 educational practitioners and policymakers. However, with the exclusion of specific disciplinary combinations such as Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) or Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), the empirical scholarship on ITL in K-12 settings is unsystematic, leading to difficulties in knowledge integration. In this article, we take stock of the existing empirical literature on ITL at the K-12 level within the humanities, arts, and social sciences, examining how educational scholars have understood and implemented ITL in peer-reviewed research articles. We show how existing scholarship on ITL includes a broad range of definitions and conceptual framings of interdisciplinarity; discuss the portrayal of the process for designing and implementing ITL curricular units; and categorize the scholarly objectives of ITL research. We conclude by offering recommendations to guide the future development of this burgeoning field of study.
KW - Curricular integration
KW - Humanities education
KW - Interdisciplinary teaching and learning
KW - Social science education
KW - Transdisciplinary learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199543735&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100617
DO - 10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100617
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85199543735
SN - 1747-938X
VL - 44
JO - Educational Research Review
JF - Educational Research Review
M1 - 100617
ER -