Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Intermediate-term oncological and functional outcomes of neoadjuvant 177-Lu-PSMA-I&T radionuclide treatment followed by radical prostatectomy

  • Michael Frumer
  • , Elisha Fredman
  • , Maxim Yakimov
  • , Daniel Kedar
  • , Jack Baniel
  • , David Groshar
  • , Eli Rosenbaum
  • , Hanna Bernstine
  • , Shay Golan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the intermediate-term oncological and functional outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa) who were treated with neoadjuvant lutetium-177-prostate-specific membrane antigen (LuPSMA) followed by robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods: An open-label, single-arm clinical trial enrolled patients with HRPCa and increased uptake on PSMA-PET/CT. Two or three LuPSMA doses (7.4 GBq) were given followed by RARP with lymph node dissection. Oncological outcomes (histological and radiological findings, biochemical recurrence-free survival [bRFS]), changes in urinary and sexual functions and quality of life were analyzed. Results: Thirteen patients (median age 67) were included. Over a median follow-up of 58 months (IQR 52, 63), bRFS rate was 42% with a median of 12 months (IQR 12, 30) from surgery to biochemical recurrence (BCR). BCR occurred in all three patients with significant positive surgical margins (sPSM) compared to 4/9 patients (44%) without sPSM. Log-rank analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in bRFS between these two groups (p = 0.009). In the subgroup of patients with BCR, the adverse effects of salvage radiation and androgen deprivation therapy after LuPSMA and subsequent RARP did not appear to be exacerbated by prior administration of LuPSMA. The preliminary nature of this trial, combined with the small cohort, requires that the oncological findings be interpreted with caution. Conclusions: Follow-up for more than four years showed that treatment with neoadjuvant LuPSMA followed by RARP appears to be safe for patients with HRPCa. However, more than half of these patients experienced BCR and required salvage therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Article number274
JournalWorld Journal of Urology
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2026
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Lutetium
  • Neoadjuvant therapy
  • Prostate cancer
  • Prostatectomy
  • Radiation therapy
  • Theranostics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intermediate-term oncological and functional outcomes of neoadjuvant 177-Lu-PSMA-I&T radionuclide treatment followed by radical prostatectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this