It is logically impossible for everlasting God to fall into boredom

Jerome Gellman

doi:10.1017/S0034412517000300

It is logically impossible for everlasting God to fall into boredom

Jerome Gellman

Department of Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This article argues that everlasting God can be in boredom, but cannot fall into boredom. Hence, the argument by Andric and Tanyi (2017) in this journal that God could not be everlasting in time, because God would fall into boredom, is shown to be unsound, since it is logically impossible for God to fall into boredom.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	285-288
Number of pages	4
Journal	Religious Studies
Volume	54
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412517000300
State	Published - 1 Jun 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Religious studies
Philosophy

Access to Document

10.1017/S0034412517000300

Cite this

@article{add9b1685d5b401f90ee35d7b96268a8,

title = "It is logically impossible for everlasting God to fall into boredom",

abstract = "This article argues that everlasting God can be in boredom, but cannot fall into boredom. Hence, the argument by Andric and Tanyi (2017) in this journal that God could not be everlasting in time, because God would fall into boredom, is shown to be unsound, since it is logically impossible for God to fall into boredom.",

author = "Jerome Gellman",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 Cambridge University Press.",

year = "2018",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1017/S0034412517000300",

language = "English",

volume = "54",

pages = "285--288",

journal = "Religious Studies",

issn = "0034-4125",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - It is logically impossible for everlasting God to fall into boredom

AU - Gellman, Jerome

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - This article argues that everlasting God can be in boredom, but cannot fall into boredom. Hence, the argument by Andric and Tanyi (2017) in this journal that God could not be everlasting in time, because God would fall into boredom, is shown to be unsound, since it is logically impossible for God to fall into boredom.

AB - This article argues that everlasting God can be in boredom, but cannot fall into boredom. Hence, the argument by Andric and Tanyi (2017) in this journal that God could not be everlasting in time, because God would fall into boredom, is shown to be unsound, since it is logically impossible for God to fall into boredom.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045914138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0034412517000300

DO - 10.1017/S0034412517000300

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85045914138

SN - 0034-4125

VL - 54

SP - 285

EP - 288

JO - Religious Studies

JF - Religious Studies

IS - 2

ER -

It is logically impossible for everlasting God to fall into boredom

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this