It’s (Not) All About the Jacksons: Testing Different Types of Short-Term Bonuses in the Field

Liad Bareket-Bojmel, Guy Hochman, Dan Ariely

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Scopus citations

Abstract

The use of short-term bonuses to motivate employees has become an organizational regularity, but a thorough understanding of the relationship between these incentives and actual performance is lacking. We aim to advance this understanding by examining how three types of bonuses (cash, family meal voucher, and verbal reward) affect employees’ productivity in a field experiment conducted in a high-tech manufacturing factory. While all types of bonuses increased performance by over 5%, nonmonetary short-term bonuses had a slight advantage over monetary bonuses. In addition, the removal of the bonuses led to decreased productivity for monetary bonuses but not for the verbal reward. However, this negative effect of monetary short-term bonuses diminishes when a cash bonus is chosen by employees rather than granted by default. Theoretical implications about the effect of short-term bonuses on intrinsic motivation and reciprocity, as well as practical applications of short-term bonus plans that stem from our findings, are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)534-554
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Management
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • motivation
  • nonmonetary
  • productivity
  • recognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Strategy and Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'It’s (Not) All About the Jacksons: Testing Different Types of Short-Term Bonuses in the Field'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this