Kant’s regulative metaphysics of god and the systematic lawfulness of nature

Noam Hoffer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


In the “Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic” of the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant contends that the idea of God has a positive regulative role in the systematization of empirical knowledge. But why is this regulative role assigned to this specific idea? Kant’s account is rather opaque, and this question has also not received much attention in the literature. In this article, I argue that an adequate understanding of the regulative role of the idea of God depends on the specific metaphysical content Kant attributes to it in the Critique and other writings. I show that neither a heuristic principle of conceptual systematicity, nor conceiving God as a hypothesis of an intelligent designer, can satisfy the demands of reason to make the unity and necessity of the laws of nature intelligible. Regarding the positive account about the metaphysical content of the idea of God, I support my argument by referring to Kant’s precritical discussion of the usefulness of the conception of God for the project of science, and by expounding Kant’s critical account of the necessity of the laws of nature. Thus, my account sheds light on the continuity of Kant’s conception of God and his appropriation of his own rationalistic metaphysics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-239
Number of pages23
JournalSouthern Journal of Philosophy
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2019
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy


Dive into the research topics of 'Kant’s regulative metaphysics of god and the systematic lawfulness of nature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this