Laparoscopic treatment of gastroduodenal perforations: Comparison with conventional surgery

B. Kirshtein, M. Bayme, T. Mayer, L. Lantsberg, E. Avinoach, S. Mizrahi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic techniques have been proposed as an alternative to open surgery for the treatment of peptic ulcer perforation. This study compared the outcome of laparoscopic and open approaches for the repair of gastroduodenal perforations. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted with 134 consecutive patients treated for gastroduodenal perforations. These patients included 122 with perforated duodenal ulcers, 10 with perforated gastric ulcers, and 2 with iatrogenic duodenal perforations. Whereas 68 patients were treated laparoscopically, 66 patients underwent conventional (open) surgery. Results: Laparoscopic repair was successful in 65 cases (96 %). The mean operating time was shorter with the laparoscopic technique (68 vs 59 min), but the difference was not significant. The duration of postoperative nasogastric aspiration and time to resumed oral intake were shorter in the laparoscopic group (2.6 vs 4.1 days and 4.4 vs. 5.2 days, respectively; p = 0.043). The postoperative analgetic requirements, and overall complications rate were significantly lower after laparoscopic surgery (p = 0.03 and p = 0.004, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in hospital stay (5.1 vs 6.1 days) or mortality rate between the two procedures. Conclusion: Laparoscopic repair of gastroduodenal perforations is a safe alternative treatment offering certain significant short-term advantages.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1487-1490
Number of pages4
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume19
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Laparoscopy
  • Omentoplasty
  • Perforated ulcer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Laparoscopic treatment of gastroduodenal perforations: Comparison with conventional surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this