Lay Attitudes Towards End-of-Life Decision-Making in Germany and Israel

Aviad E. Raz; Silke Schicktanz

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32733-4_7

Lay Attitudes Towards End-of-Life Decision-Making in Germany and Israel

Aviad E. Raz
, Silke Schicktanz

Department of Sociology and Anthropology

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

Abstract

National differences in end of life regulation are mirrored only partly in the attitudes of lay persons and influenced by the religious views and personal experiences of those being affected. Based on respect for autonomy, lay persons in non-religious groups in both countries argue for possibilities of euthanasia in severe cases, but caution against its possible misuse. National contrast was apparent in the moral reasoning of lay respondents concerning the distinction between withholding and withdrawing treatment. Modern religious lay persons in Israel argued strongly against allowing the withdrawal of treatment based on a patient’s wish, by referring to the halakhic tradition.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	SpringerBriefs in Ethics
Publisher	Springer Nature
Pages	81-94
Number of pages	14
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32733-4_7
State	Published - 1 Jan 2016

Publication series

Name	SpringerBriefs in Ethics
ISSN (Print)	2211-8101
ISSN (Electronic)	2211-811X

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

Active Euthanasia
Advance Directive
Assisted Suicide
German Group
Shared Decision Process

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Philosophy
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-319-32733-4_7

Cite this

@inbook{3a3a5e9af3f24228bef651773f1fea2a,

title = "Lay Attitudes Towards End-of-Life Decision-Making in Germany and Israel",

abstract = "National differences in end of life regulation are mirrored only partly in the attitudes of lay persons and influenced by the religious views and personal experiences of those being affected. Based on respect for autonomy, lay persons in non-religious groups in both countries argue for possibilities of euthanasia in severe cases, but caution against its possible misuse. National contrast was apparent in the moral reasoning of lay respondents concerning the distinction between withholding and withdrawing treatment. Modern religious lay persons in Israel argued strongly against allowing the withdrawal of treatment based on a patient{\textquoteright}s wish, by referring to the halakhic tradition.",

keywords = "Active Euthanasia, Advance Directive, Assisted Suicide, German Group, Shared Decision Process",

author = "Raz, \{Aviad E.\} and Silke Schicktanz",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016, The Author(s).",

year = "2016",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-32733-4\_7",

language = "English",

series = "SpringerBriefs in Ethics",

publisher = "Springer Nature",

pages = "81--94",

booktitle = "SpringerBriefs in Ethics",

address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Lay Attitudes Towards End-of-Life Decision-Making in Germany and Israel

AU - Raz, Aviad E.

AU - Schicktanz, Silke

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - National differences in end of life regulation are mirrored only partly in the attitudes of lay persons and influenced by the religious views and personal experiences of those being affected. Based on respect for autonomy, lay persons in non-religious groups in both countries argue for possibilities of euthanasia in severe cases, but caution against its possible misuse. National contrast was apparent in the moral reasoning of lay respondents concerning the distinction between withholding and withdrawing treatment. Modern religious lay persons in Israel argued strongly against allowing the withdrawal of treatment based on a patient’s wish, by referring to the halakhic tradition.

AB - National differences in end of life regulation are mirrored only partly in the attitudes of lay persons and influenced by the religious views and personal experiences of those being affected. Based on respect for autonomy, lay persons in non-religious groups in both countries argue for possibilities of euthanasia in severe cases, but caution against its possible misuse. National contrast was apparent in the moral reasoning of lay respondents concerning the distinction between withholding and withdrawing treatment. Modern religious lay persons in Israel argued strongly against allowing the withdrawal of treatment based on a patient’s wish, by referring to the halakhic tradition.

KW - Active Euthanasia

KW - Advance Directive

KW - Assisted Suicide

KW - German Group

KW - Shared Decision Process

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85103977482

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-32733-4_7

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-32733-4_7

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85103977482

T3 - SpringerBriefs in Ethics

SP - 81

EP - 94

BT - SpringerBriefs in Ethics

PB - Springer Nature

ER -

Lay Attitudes Towards End-of-Life Decision-Making in Germany and Israel

Abstract

Publication series

UN SDGs

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this