Abstract
The article sheds fresh light on socio-legal change in the Ottoman Empire during the late nineteenth century by focusing on the legal culture that emerged in the newly established Nizamiye court system. It is argued that a characteristic Nizamiye discourse that emphasized procedure mirrored the syncretic nature of this judicial system. This syncretism was a typical outcome of legal borrowing, encompassing both indigenous and foreign legal traditions. In addition, the article points to the possible impact of the new legal culture on judicial strategies employed by litigants. The accentuation of procedure opened up new litigation opportunities for the wealthier classes while disadvantaging and alienating the lower strata of society. Yet Ottoman law also provided some legal solutions for the lower orders.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 279-303 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Continuity and Change |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 13 Aug 2007 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- History
- General Social Sciences