TY - GEN
T1 - Light Spanners with Small Hop-Diameter
AU - Bhore, Sujoy
AU - Milenković, Lazar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Sujoy Bhore and Lazar Milenković
PY - 2025/6/30
Y1 - 2025/6/30
N2 - Lightness, sparsity, and hop-diameter are the fundamental parameters of geometric spanners. Arya et al. [STOC’95] showed in their seminal work that there exists a construction of Euclidean (1 + ε)spanners with hop-diameter O(log n) and lightness O(log n). They also gave a general tradeoff of hop-diameter k and sparsity O(αk(n)), where αk is a very slowly growing inverse of an Ackermann-style function. The former combination of logarithmic hop-diameter and lightness is optimal due to the lower bound by Dinitz et al. [FOCS’08]. Later, Elkin and Solomon [STOC’13] generalized the light spanner construction to doubling metrics and extended the tradeoff for more values of hop-diameter k. In a recent line of work [SoCG’22, SoCG’23], Le et al. proved that the aforementioned tradeoff between the hop-diameter and sparsity is tight for every choice of hop-diameter k. A fundamental question remains: What is the optimal tradeoff between the hop-diameter and lightness for every value of k? In this paper, we present a general framework for constructing light spanners with small hop-diameter. Our framework is based on tree covers. In particular, we show that if a metric admits a tree cover with γ trees, stretch t, and lightness L, then it also admits a t-spanner with hop-diameter k and lightness O(kn2/k · γL). Further, we note that the tradeoff for trees is tight due to a construction in uniform line metric, which is perhaps the simplest tree metric. As a direct consequence of this framework, we obtain new tradeoffs between lightness and hop-diameter for doubling metrics.
AB - Lightness, sparsity, and hop-diameter are the fundamental parameters of geometric spanners. Arya et al. [STOC’95] showed in their seminal work that there exists a construction of Euclidean (1 + ε)spanners with hop-diameter O(log n) and lightness O(log n). They also gave a general tradeoff of hop-diameter k and sparsity O(αk(n)), where αk is a very slowly growing inverse of an Ackermann-style function. The former combination of logarithmic hop-diameter and lightness is optimal due to the lower bound by Dinitz et al. [FOCS’08]. Later, Elkin and Solomon [STOC’13] generalized the light spanner construction to doubling metrics and extended the tradeoff for more values of hop-diameter k. In a recent line of work [SoCG’22, SoCG’23], Le et al. proved that the aforementioned tradeoff between the hop-diameter and sparsity is tight for every choice of hop-diameter k. A fundamental question remains: What is the optimal tradeoff between the hop-diameter and lightness for every value of k? In this paper, we present a general framework for constructing light spanners with small hop-diameter. Our framework is based on tree covers. In particular, we show that if a metric admits a tree cover with γ trees, stretch t, and lightness L, then it also admits a t-spanner with hop-diameter k and lightness O(kn2/k · γL). Further, we note that the tradeoff for trees is tight due to a construction in uniform line metric, which is perhaps the simplest tree metric. As a direct consequence of this framework, we obtain new tradeoffs between lightness and hop-diameter for doubling metrics.
KW - Geometric Spanners
KW - Hop-Diameter
KW - Lightness
KW - Lower Bounds
KW - Recurrences
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105009891296
U2 - 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.30
DO - 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.30
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105009891296
T3 - Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs
BT - 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2025
A2 - Censor-Hillel, Keren
A2 - Grandoni, Fabrizio
A2 - Ouaknine, Joel
A2 - Puppis, Gabriele
PB - Schloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing
T2 - 52nd EATCS International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2025
Y2 - 8 July 2025 through 11 July 2025
ER -