TY - JOUR
T1 - Longitudinal Assessment of the Dynamics of Escherichia coli, Total Coliforms, Enterococcus spp., and Aeromonas spp. in Alternative Irrigation Water Sources
T2 - a CONSERVE Study
AU - Solaiman, Sultana
AU - Allard, Sarah M.
AU - Callahan, Mary Theresa
AU - Jiang, Chengsheng
AU - Handy, Eric
AU - East, Cheryl
AU - Haymaker, Joseph
AU - Bui, Anthony
AU - Craddock, Hillary
AU - Murray, Rianna
AU - Kulkarni, Prachi
AU - Anderson-Coughlin, Brienna
AU - Craighead, Shani
AU - Gartley, Samantha
AU - Vanore, Adam
AU - Duncan, Rico
AU - Foust, Derek
AU - Taabodi, Maryam
AU - Sapkota, Amir
AU - May, Eric
AU - Hashem, Fawzy
AU - Parveen, Salina
AU - Kniel, Kalmia
AU - Sharma, Manan
AU - Sapkota, Amy R.
AU - Micallef, Shirley A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - As climate change continues to stress freshwater resources, we have a pressing need to identify alternative (nontraditional) sources of microbially safe water for irrigation of fresh produce. This study is part of the center CONSERVE, which aims to facilitate the adoption of adequate agricultural water sources. A 26-month longitudinal study was conducted at 11 sites to assess the prevalence of bacteria indicating water quality, fecal contamination, and crop contamination risk (Escherichia coli, total coliforms [TC], Enterococcus, and Aeromonas). Sites included nontidal fresh-water rivers/creeks (NF), a tidal brackish river (TB), irrigation ponds (PW), and reclaimed water sites (RW). Water samples were filtered for bacterial quantification. E. coli, TC, enterococci (~86%, 98%, and 90% positive, respectively; n = 333), and Aeromonas (~98% positive; n = 133) were widespread in water samples tested. Highest E. coli counts were in rivers, TC counts in TB, and enterococci in rivers and ponds (P< 0.001 in all cases) compared to other water types. Aeromonas counts were consistent across sites. Seasonal dynamics were detected in NF and PW samples only. E. coli counts were higher in the vegetable crop-growing (May-October) than nongrowing (November-April) season in all water types (P < 0.05). Only one RW and both PW sites met the U.S. Food Safety Modernization Act water standards. However, implementation of recommended mitigation measures of allowing time for microbial die-off between irrigation and harvest would bring all other sites into compliance within 2 days. This study provides comprehensive microbial data on alternative irrigation water and serves as an important resource for food safety planning and policy setting.
AB - As climate change continues to stress freshwater resources, we have a pressing need to identify alternative (nontraditional) sources of microbially safe water for irrigation of fresh produce. This study is part of the center CONSERVE, which aims to facilitate the adoption of adequate agricultural water sources. A 26-month longitudinal study was conducted at 11 sites to assess the prevalence of bacteria indicating water quality, fecal contamination, and crop contamination risk (Escherichia coli, total coliforms [TC], Enterococcus, and Aeromonas). Sites included nontidal fresh-water rivers/creeks (NF), a tidal brackish river (TB), irrigation ponds (PW), and reclaimed water sites (RW). Water samples were filtered for bacterial quantification. E. coli, TC, enterococci (~86%, 98%, and 90% positive, respectively; n = 333), and Aeromonas (~98% positive; n = 133) were widespread in water samples tested. Highest E. coli counts were in rivers, TC counts in TB, and enterococci in rivers and ponds (P< 0.001 in all cases) compared to other water types. Aeromonas counts were consistent across sites. Seasonal dynamics were detected in NF and PW samples only. E. coli counts were higher in the vegetable crop-growing (May-October) than nongrowing (November-April) season in all water types (P < 0.05). Only one RW and both PW sites met the U.S. Food Safety Modernization Act water standards. However, implementation of recommended mitigation measures of allowing time for microbial die-off between irrigation and harvest would bring all other sites into compliance within 2 days. This study provides comprehensive microbial data on alternative irrigation water and serves as an important resource for food safety planning and policy setting.
KW - Aeromonas
KW - Food Safety Modernization Act
KW - fecal indicators
KW - food safety
KW - irrigation water
KW - irrigation water physicochemical parameters
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092682432&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1128/AEM.00342-20
DO - 10.1128/AEM.00342-20
M3 - Article
C2 - 32769196
AN - SCOPUS:85092682432
SN - 0099-2240
VL - 86
JO - Applied and Environmental Microbiology
JF - Applied and Environmental Microbiology
IS - 20
M1 - e00342-20
ER -