TY - JOUR
T1 - Loss framing increases self-serving mistakes (but does not alter attention)
AU - Leib, Margarita
AU - Pittarello, Andrea
AU - Gordon-Hecker, Tom
AU - Shalvi, S.
AU - Roskes, Marieke
N1 - Funding Information:
The research was funded by European Research Council (ERC-StG-637915) and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (VENI grant 451-15-030).? The research was funded by European Research Council (ERC-StG-637915) and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (VENI grant 451-15-030).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2019/11/1
Y1 - 2019/11/1
N2 - In ambiguous settings, people are tempted to make self-serving mistakes. Here, we assess whether people make more self-serving mistakes to minimize losses compared with maximize gains. Results reveal that participants are twice as likely to make self-serving mistakes to reduce losses compared to increase gains. We further trace participants' eye movements to gain insight into the process underlying self-serving mistakes in losses and gains. We find that tempting, self-serving information does not capture more attention in loss, compared to gain framing. Rather, in loss framing, people are more likely to report the tempting, self-serving information they observed. The results imply that rather than diverting attention away from tempting information, reducing people's motivation to make self-serving mistakes, and framing goals as gains rather than losses are promising ways to decrease the occurrence of self-serving mistakes. In turn, this fosters environments with more accuracy and fewer motivated mistakes.
AB - In ambiguous settings, people are tempted to make self-serving mistakes. Here, we assess whether people make more self-serving mistakes to minimize losses compared with maximize gains. Results reveal that participants are twice as likely to make self-serving mistakes to reduce losses compared to increase gains. We further trace participants' eye movements to gain insight into the process underlying self-serving mistakes in losses and gains. We find that tempting, self-serving information does not capture more attention in loss, compared to gain framing. Rather, in loss framing, people are more likely to report the tempting, self-serving information they observed. The results imply that rather than diverting attention away from tempting information, reducing people's motivation to make self-serving mistakes, and framing goals as gains rather than losses are promising ways to decrease the occurrence of self-serving mistakes. In turn, this fosters environments with more accuracy and fewer motivated mistakes.
KW - Ambiguous dice paradigm
KW - Attention
KW - Ethical decision making
KW - Eye-tracking
KW - Framing
KW - Motivated mistakes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070368994&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103880
DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103880
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85070368994
SN - 0022-1031
VL - 85
JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
M1 - 103880
ER -