Abstract
Contrary to most interpretations, the article argues that the scandalous dimensions of Machiavelli's thought are the outcome of his critical reflections on humanist discourse. Machiavelli drew the radical conclusions from the humanist rejection of the classical and medieval vision of man as a creature with an objective telos, within a rational order of Being. From this perspective the article accounts for Machiavelli's separation of politics from ethics, his anti-Christian stance as well as his appreciation of the social and political importance of religion, his views concerning corruption and the fragility of the political body, and ultimately his anthropological premises, notably his perception of man as a creature driven by indeterminate and insatiable desire.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 247-282 |
| Number of pages | 36 |
| Journal | History of Political Thought |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - 29 Jun 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- History
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Machiavelli's critique of humanism and the ambivalences of modernity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver