TY - JOUR
T1 - Mapping variability in allocation of Long-Term Care funds across payer agencies in OECD countries
AU - Waitzberg, Ruth
AU - Schmidt, Andrea E.
AU - Blümel, Miriam
AU - Penneau, Anne
AU - Farmakas, Antonis
AU - Ljungvall, Åsa
AU - Barbabella, Francesco
AU - Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo
AU - Marchildon, Gregory P.
AU - Saunes, Ingrid Sperre
AU - Vočanec, Dorja
AU - Miloš, Iva
AU - Contel, Joan Carles
AU - Murauskiene, Liubove
AU - Kroneman, Madelon
AU - Tambor, Marzena
AU - Hroboň, Pavel
AU - Wittenberg, Raphael
AU - Allin, Sara
AU - Or, Zeynep
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Shirly Resnisky for the constructive comments. We thank the Israeli National Insurance Institute for partially funding this project, and Ricerca Corrente funding from the Italian Ministry of Health to IRCCS INRCA.
Funding Information:
We thank Shirly Resnisky for the constructive comments. We thank the Israeli National Insurance Institute for partially funding this project, and Ricerca Corrente funding from the Italian Ministry of Health to IRCCS INRCA.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - Introduction: Long-term care (LTC) is organized in a fragmented manner. Payer agencies (PA) receive LTC funds from the agency collecting funds, and commission services. Yet, distributional equity (DE) across PAs, a precondition to geographical equity of access to LTC, has received limited attention. We conceptualize that LTC systems promote DE when they are designed to set eligibility criteria nationally (vs. locally); and to distribute funds among PAs based on needs-formula (vs. past-budgets or government decisions). Objectives: This cross-country study highlights to what extent different LTC systems are designed to promote DE across PAs, and the parameters used in allocation formulae. Methods: Qualitative data were collected through a questionnaire filled by experts from 17 OECD countries. Results: 11 out of 25 LTC systems analyzed, fully meet DE as we defined. 5 systems which give high autonomy to PAs have designs with low levels of DE; while nine systems partially promote DE. Allocation formulae vary in their complexity as some systems use simple demographic parameters while others apply socio-economic status, disability, and LTC cost variations. Discussion and conclusions: A minority of LTC systems fully meet DE, which is only one of the criteria in allocation of LTC resources. Some systems prefer local priority-setting and governance over DE. Countries that value DE should harmonize the eligibility criteria at the national level and allocate funds according to needs across regions.
AB - Introduction: Long-term care (LTC) is organized in a fragmented manner. Payer agencies (PA) receive LTC funds from the agency collecting funds, and commission services. Yet, distributional equity (DE) across PAs, a precondition to geographical equity of access to LTC, has received limited attention. We conceptualize that LTC systems promote DE when they are designed to set eligibility criteria nationally (vs. locally); and to distribute funds among PAs based on needs-formula (vs. past-budgets or government decisions). Objectives: This cross-country study highlights to what extent different LTC systems are designed to promote DE across PAs, and the parameters used in allocation formulae. Methods: Qualitative data were collected through a questionnaire filled by experts from 17 OECD countries. Results: 11 out of 25 LTC systems analyzed, fully meet DE as we defined. 5 systems which give high autonomy to PAs have designs with low levels of DE; while nine systems partially promote DE. Allocation formulae vary in their complexity as some systems use simple demographic parameters while others apply socio-economic status, disability, and LTC cost variations. Discussion and conclusions: A minority of LTC systems fully meet DE, which is only one of the criteria in allocation of LTC resources. Some systems prefer local priority-setting and governance over DE. Countries that value DE should harmonize the eligibility criteria at the national level and allocate funds according to needs across regions.
KW - Allocation formula
KW - Equity
KW - Funds allocation
KW - Long-term care
KW - Payer agencies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081891951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.02.013
DO - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.02.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 32197994
AN - SCOPUS:85081891951
SN - 0168-8510
VL - 124
SP - 491
EP - 500
JO - Health Policy
JF - Health Policy
IS - 5
ER -