TY - JOUR
T1 - Marburg virus survivor immune responses are Th1 skewed with limited neutralizing antibody responses
AU - Stonier, Spencer W.
AU - Herbert, Andrew S.
AU - Kuehne, Ana I.
AU - Sobarzo, Ariel
AU - Habibulin, Polina
AU - Dahan, Chen V.Abramovitch
AU - James, Rebekah M.
AU - Egesa, Moses
AU - Cose, Stephen
AU - Lutwama, Julius Julian
AU - Lobel, Leslie
AU - Dye, John M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (grant CB10138). Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the U.S. Army. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Stonier et al.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Until recently, immune responses in filovirus survivors remained poorly understood. Early studies revealed IgM and IgG responses to infection with various filoviruses, but recent outbreaks have greatly expanded our understanding of filovirus immune responses. Immune responses in survivors of Ebola virus (EBOV) and Sudan virus (SUDV) infections have provided the most insight, with T cell responses as well as detailed antibody responses having been characterized. Immune responses to Marburg virus (MARV), however, remain almost entirely uncharacterized. We report that immune responses in MARV survivors share characteristics with EBOV and SUDV infections but have some distinct differences. MARV survivors developed multivariate CD4+ T cell responses but limited CD8+ T cell responses, more in keeping with SUDV survivors than EBOV survivors. In stark contrast to SUDV survivors, rare neutralizing antibody responses in MARV survivors diminished rapidly after the outbreak. These results warrant serious consideration for any vaccine or therapeutic that seeks to be broadly protective, as different filoviruses may require different immune responses to achieve immunity.
AB - Until recently, immune responses in filovirus survivors remained poorly understood. Early studies revealed IgM and IgG responses to infection with various filoviruses, but recent outbreaks have greatly expanded our understanding of filovirus immune responses. Immune responses in survivors of Ebola virus (EBOV) and Sudan virus (SUDV) infections have provided the most insight, with T cell responses as well as detailed antibody responses having been characterized. Immune responses to Marburg virus (MARV), however, remain almost entirely uncharacterized. We report that immune responses in MARV survivors share characteristics with EBOV and SUDV infections but have some distinct differences. MARV survivors developed multivariate CD4+ T cell responses but limited CD8+ T cell responses, more in keeping with SUDV survivors than EBOV survivors. In stark contrast to SUDV survivors, rare neutralizing antibody responses in MARV survivors diminished rapidly after the outbreak. These results warrant serious consideration for any vaccine or therapeutic that seeks to be broadly protective, as different filoviruses may require different immune responses to achieve immunity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028890482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1084/jem.20170161
DO - 10.1084/jem.20170161
M3 - Article
C2 - 28724616
AN - SCOPUS:85028890482
VL - 214
SP - 2563
EP - 2572
JO - Journal of Experimental Medicine
JF - Journal of Experimental Medicine
SN - 0022-1007
IS - 9
ER -