Material Objects, Constitution, and Mysterianism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


It is sometimes claimed that ordinary objects, such as mountains and chairs, are not material in their own right, but only in virtue of the fact that they are constituted by matter. As Fine puts it, they are "only derivatively material" (2003, 211). In this paper I argue that invoking "constitution" to account for the materiality of things that are not material in their own right explains nothing and renders the admission that these objects are indeed material completely mysterious. Although there may be metaphysical contexts in which mysterianism can be accepted with equanimity, I further argue, the question of the materiality of quotidian objects is not one of them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-26
Number of pages26
JournalSouthern Journal of Philosophy
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy


Dive into the research topics of 'Material Objects, Constitution, and Mysterianism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this