TY - JOUR
T1 - Mediated Public Diplomacy and RT on Instagram
T2 - Role of International Institutions, Audience Engagement, and Online Account Bans
AU - Winkler, Carol Kay
AU - Massignan, Virginia
AU - El Damanhoury, Kareem
AU - Yachin, Mor
AU - Lokmanoglu, Ayse Deniz
AU - McMinimy, Kayla Denise
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - Changes in the global media environment now challenge relationships between and within states. To expand understandings of mediated public diplomacy, this study examined 13,500 Instagram posts distributed on RT’s non-Russian accounts from September 2021–September 2022. It used LDA to identify RT topics across language accounts, explored the topics’ relation to UN statehood, examined audience engagement levels, and compared their frequency before and after major bans on RT content. The study found that more than two-thirds of the top 30 topics had direct relevance to the statehood frame. RT’s language accounts did employ unique audience-targeting strategies and situation-dependent emphases linked to the timing of their banned content, but the approaches varied according to which of the four statehood criteria were under discussion. High levels of audience engagement for statehood-related posts linked to each of the statehood definitional characteristics, but did not correspond to the frequency of the posted content. The study concludes with implications for mediated public diplomacy theory.
AB - Changes in the global media environment now challenge relationships between and within states. To expand understandings of mediated public diplomacy, this study examined 13,500 Instagram posts distributed on RT’s non-Russian accounts from September 2021–September 2022. It used LDA to identify RT topics across language accounts, explored the topics’ relation to UN statehood, examined audience engagement levels, and compared their frequency before and after major bans on RT content. The study found that more than two-thirds of the top 30 topics had direct relevance to the statehood frame. RT’s language accounts did employ unique audience-targeting strategies and situation-dependent emphases linked to the timing of their banned content, but the approaches varied according to which of the four statehood criteria were under discussion. High levels of audience engagement for statehood-related posts linked to each of the statehood definitional characteristics, but did not correspond to the frequency of the posted content. The study concludes with implications for mediated public diplomacy theory.
KW - RT
KW - audience engagement
KW - content bans
KW - mediated public diplomacy
KW - statehood
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85202492475
U2 - 10.1080/1461670X.2024.2396365
DO - 10.1080/1461670X.2024.2396365
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85202492475
SN - 1461-670X
VL - 25
SP - 1795
EP - 1812
JO - Journalism Studies
JF - Journalism Studies
IS - 15
ER -