TY - JOUR
T1 - Mental representation
T2 - What can pitch tell us about the distance effect?
AU - Kadosh, Roi Cohen
AU - Brodsky, Warren
AU - Levin, Michal
AU - Henik, Avishai
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was partly supported by grants to R.C.K. from the Kreitman Foundation, and the International Brain Research Organization, and by a grant to A.H. from the Israel Science Foundation (grant 431/05).
PY - 2008/1/1
Y1 - 2008/1/1
N2 - Reaction time (RT) profiles for comparing magnitudes (e.g., numbers, physical sizes) are similar - the larger the difference between the compared stimuli, the shorter the RT (distance effect). Nevertheless, it is unclear whether such correspondence is due to similar, two-dimensional, linear mental representations of magnitudes. In contrast, pitch perception has a more complex, two-dimensional, helical representation. This study examined whether comparisons of music pitches are similar to other magnitude response functions. Experiment 1 employed a comparison task, resulting in an RT profile identical to that obtained when comparing other magnitudes. In contrast, Experiment 2 employed a discrimination task, resulting in RTs that matched the helical representation and were dissociated from the classical distance effect. Experiment 3 replicated the results of Experiment 1 using a comparison task with different stimuli and intervals. These findings imply that the distance effect under comparison tasks might reflect a general sensorimotor transformation, rather than mental representation per se.
AB - Reaction time (RT) profiles for comparing magnitudes (e.g., numbers, physical sizes) are similar - the larger the difference between the compared stimuli, the shorter the RT (distance effect). Nevertheless, it is unclear whether such correspondence is due to similar, two-dimensional, linear mental representations of magnitudes. In contrast, pitch perception has a more complex, two-dimensional, helical representation. This study examined whether comparisons of music pitches are similar to other magnitude response functions. Experiment 1 employed a comparison task, resulting in an RT profile identical to that obtained when comparing other magnitudes. In contrast, Experiment 2 employed a discrimination task, resulting in RTs that matched the helical representation and were dissociated from the classical distance effect. Experiment 3 replicated the results of Experiment 1 using a comparison task with different stimuli and intervals. These findings imply that the distance effect under comparison tasks might reflect a general sensorimotor transformation, rather than mental representation per se.
KW - Distance effect
KW - Magnitude
KW - Mental representation
KW - Numbers
KW - Pitch
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44249106334&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.002
DO - 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:44249106334
SN - 0010-9452
VL - 44
SP - 470
EP - 477
JO - Cortex
JF - Cortex
IS - 4
ER -